I made the assumption that most of
the material would be focused on organizational leadership when I made the
decision to pursue my master’s degree in leadership. Organizational leadership
just seemed like the logical focus since organizations are where most leaders
operate and most of us are in some type of organization. Right?
Wrong. Not only did I make
another assumption about what material this course would focus on, but I
assumed that everyone had the same intention for pursuing their Master’s degree
in leadership. My current position as a
program coordinator has forced me to have an analytical mind. I perform audits and evaluate processes on a
daily basis so analyzing is essential towards being successful. I actually thrive in this environment because
I have found over the years that I instinctively analyze things. Things like people, processes, and basically
anything else I come in contact with. I
believed I understood this process to the fullest extent before I began this
course (Leadership Foundation in Research).
When I received my textbook Learning
to think things through: A guide to critical thinking across the curriculum (Nosich,
2012), I noticed it didn’t even mention leadership. This confused me a bit. I mean, I am taking a leadership course. However, I now realize that I was not an
expert on analyzing, critical thinking and analyzing are two different things, and
I was not practicing critical thinking to the fullest extent possible.
I have already noticed a difference
in the way I approach things in my career, at home, and life in general from
the few weeks of learning about critical thinking. There are many interpretations and terms
associated with critical thinking such as reasonable, reflective, and
authentic. But I think that Richard Paul
defines critical thinking best in stating, “critical thinking is thinking about
your thinking, while you’re thinking, in order to make your thinking better”
(Nosich, 2012, p. 2). That is a simple
yet profound summary of critical thinking.
A few areas I have studied within the critical thinking process have
given me a better understanding of what critical thinking is and how it
works. For example, there are elements
of reasoning and standards of critical thinking. I exhibited the element of making an
assumption in my aforementioned example about what I assumed in regards to this
course. I learned that making an
assumption is acceptable because there is no starting point to when reasoning. And the SEE-I process has become essential in
my critical thinking. SEE-I has made
things I am working on much clearer, especially in my academics. I am just starting to be able to put what I
have learned into practice. I know if I
continue to familiarize myself with critical thinking, it will only lead to a
better understanding and positive changes in all aspects of my life. I believe I can accomplish familiarizing myself
and becoming more comfortable with the process through genuinely learning my
textbook and continuously applying it to my academics, my career, and life. I understand using a textbook is only part of
making positive changes to the way I think.
I will also use my experiences to progress, shape my thinking, and grow.
Nosich, G. M. (2012). Learning to think things through: A
guide to critical thinking across the curriculum (4th edition). Boston, MA:
Pearson.
No comments:
Post a Comment